Sun 2003-10-05 21:13, Dmitry Sergienko (2:464/910.1) wrote to andrew clarke:

 DS> Sreda Maj 07 2003, at 07:38 andrew clarke wrote to Bo Simonsen:

 ac>>>> Or you could link it with the latest SMAPI (which may or may not
 ac>>>> have proper support for JAM).

 BS>>> Oh, yes that's right. The JAM error is fixed in Current.

 ac>> I just did a CVS checkout of SMAPI.  There aren't any recent comments
 ac>> about JAM support in the ChangeLog, and the assert() is still there in
 ac>> api_jam.c, which leads me to think that it isn't fixed.  Pity I can't
 ac>> compile it!

 DS> Please tell about which error in JAM are you talking.

This is an old thread, and I forget what the original bug was, but it was
probably that
JamWriteMsg() does not support append=1, which breaks anything that
requires it (when writing to JAM bases), notably timEd, but also other
programs that rely on behaviour conforming to Scott Dudley's original
MSGAPI.  Refer to the Scott's docs on MsgWriteMsg() regarding the append
parameter.

-- mail{at}ozzmosis.com

--- timEd/FreeBSD 1.11.b1