[...]
 
TR> Some of that `research' and information may not be to the liking of all
TR> here. But to deny scientific facts is comparable to denying the force
TR> of gravity; you may deny the existence of gravity or it's effects. But
TR> I wouldn't carry that denial out any 10 story buildings without a
TR> parachute if I were you.
 
TR> Did you know, for instance, that there are as many as 52 nations tossing
TR> chemicals into the air trying to modify weather? And the US is one of
TR> them.
 
You will have to provide sources for the material you intend to post here.
But, this is not the area for that sort of "dissertation".
 
TR> Strange...see, there's been a hullabaloo over `chemicals' being put into
TR> the air causing `global warming' which, when the `warming' was shown to
TR> not be happening, morphed into `climate change!
 
TR> They've had rules for a few decades now about chemicals being
TR> emitted TR> into the atmosphere....which 52 countries (including the
TR> US) have no
TR> problem ignoring.
 
TR> Does anyone see the hypocrisy in that?
 
TR> Don't even get me started on the list of so-called `green' companies
TR> taxpayer money was (without our prior approval) sunk into and lost. The
TR> ones that have gone bankrupt alone have cost taxpayers billions of
TR> TR> dollars.
 
TR> And BTW...some new information on the workings of the Solar interior will
TR> allow more accurate predictions of the inner Solar cycles, which also
TR> affect or weather.
 
TR> There is a possibility that another `Maunder Minimum' may occur about the
TR> middle of this century.
 
TR> Although I, at 75, probably won't be here to see it, some of you are
TR> likely young enough that you'll be saying `that old bastard was right'!
 
TR> I'll be seeking out solid `science research' information to post in here
TR> often. Stay tuned.
 
As long as I allow it and you maintain control over yourself.
 
 
Roger

--- DB 3.99 + W10 (1607)