"Michael Bowker"  wrote in message 
news:NOOdnW5flaRffPvUnZ2dnUVZ_s3inZ2d{at}posted.rawbandwidth...
> Ken from Chicago wrote:
>> "Michael Bowker"  wrote in message 
>> news:rfKdneqa4vp3FPjUnZ2dnUVZ_ukAAAAA{at}posted.rawbandwidth...
>>> Anim8rFSK wrote:
>>>> In article ,
>>>>  Merrick Baldelli  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:18:58 GMT,
pgalimatias{at}hotmail.com (Pelerin
>>>>> Galimatias) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I enjoyed watching it again although I don't like
the loss of two
>>>>>> major characters.  It had great potential on TV.
>>>>> I swear watching fans of "Firefly" is like
watching the cult
>>>>> of Star Trek 30+ years ago.
>>>> When Trek was still good.
>>>>
>>> Trek is still good.
>>>
>>> Trek will always be good.
>>>
>>> Not so sure about the follow on series.
>>>
>>> :)
>>
>> DS9: Best. tv Trek (spinoff). Ever.
>>
>> -- Ken from Chicago
>
> I agree with that and yet I stand by my statement. :)

TNG was good but it peaked in its 4th season and fell off considerably 
afterward.
VOY had potential but was continually half a step off, if not flat out 
stupid.
ENT was the one I gave up on after 8 eps, altho its 4th season, the season 
of Manny, was reportedly good, but by then the damage had been done.

-- Ken from Chicago

P.S. Altho I was fond of TAS, but I was a kid then so I might have had 
blinders then.
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32