From: /m 

On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:26:22 -0400, "Rich Gauszka"
 wrote:

>
>"Adam" <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the
field.near the bridge"> wrote in
>message news:44a450d3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Rich Gauszka wrote:
>>> The Microsoft people that run that forum also love to use their editing
>>> power to alter the meaning of topic headings.  I've had the
word 'trojan'
>>> magically disappear from some of my posts. They also appear to be in
>>> denial.
>>> Dang those evil complainers on the forum who skew their happiness.
>>>
>>>
http://forums.microsoft.com/Genuine/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=510552&SiteID=25
>>> Where are these numbers and estimations based off of? The forum is very
>>> skewed result of only users having Validation issues.
>>>
>> Good Lord who is "Dan at IT associates"?
>> Is contracted to spin on MS's behalf? Kinda "Astro-dan"?
>>
>> Adam
>
>I sort of noticed that about Dan at IT Associates. I posted a link to Ed
>Bott's article on the possible Fall deactivation feature of wga and Dan's
>'informed' reply was
>
>"Uh, oh, looks like the Black Helicopter crowd gave up on proving the
>attacks on the World Trade Center were government-planned implosions, and
>decided to concentrate on Microsoft instead."

Sounds similar to what Rich Shupak was telling me here when I started to
use the phrase Microsoft Product Deactivation a few years ago...

 /m

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5