Hello Wilfred,

On 20 Jun 15 02:04, Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Nicholas Boel:

 NB>> I'm sure I could go look for myself. But with that
 NB>> excuse/attitude, you're just giving more and more reasons to
 NB>> completely ignore and disregard Fidonet? I don't want to find out
 NB>> for myself. It's nice to see what was done right here in the echo
 NB>> that is designated to the mailer itself.. is it not?

 NB>> After all, binkd would not even be a valid "useful" program if it
 NB>> weren't for Fidonet technology. It is, in fact, what it was
 NB>> created for, was it not?

 WV> In principle you are right! ;)

Thank you for the first respectful response I've seen in over a year... in ANY
echo. :)

 WV> But I couldn't find any source code change announcements for at least
 WV> the last year or so in this area. Besides this would be done by other
 WV> fido hobyists, so you can't really complain if they stop doing this.
 WV> The only thing you can do if you don't like the current situation is
 WV> ask nicely, or design and implement a github to ftn annoucement system
 WV> yourself. ;)

By now, I know you are the type to find answers for yourself. I'm one of the
same when it comes to certain things. Fido has just been a major bore for me
lately, that I don't care to indulge myself into doing anything. I've already
upgarded both of my binkd systems, but it would still be nice if those updates
were posted to the echo itself. There's only a few echos in Fidonet left  that
keep me interested, and this has been one of them. :)

Regards,
Nick

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20130910