-=> As John Mudd was in thoughtful discussion with Bud Jamison <=-
 JM> @MSGID: 1:106/1010.0 3421d070
 BJ> You want ALL old laws
 BJ> to stay the same?  Sorry, it don't work that way.  
 BJ> New laws come along,
 JM> 
 JM> Sure, but this day and age of government is becoming more and more
 JM> intrusive and micro-managerial. New and revised laws are needed, but
 JM> not to the extent that the over-reactive knee-jerk lawmakers we seem
 JM> to have sent to washington. These new communication laws are purely
 JM> created to assist the wireless/personal communications industries to
 JM> hoodwink the ignorant public into thinking thier cell phone
 JM> conversations are secure, without the expense of having to advance
 JM> digital technologies.  Are you saying that we have to accept the
 JM> probability of such laws to put the bucks in thier pockets???  nope, i
 JM> don't think so. 
 JM> 73 de KC5GMM 
 JM> John
 The main reason the law makers want to make these laws is they
don't want someone ( like maybe the little wife ) to accidentally
 hear them on thier cell phone talking to thier mistress ( or
what ever you would call the same of the opposite sex ).
        /\    /\__/\    /\
      ///\\\__( oo )__///\\\             -=[ Dracula ]=-         
    /////\\\\\(    )/////\\\\\
  ////\\\///\\\|\/|///\\\///\\\\      DeForest Ray Sparks
 //     \/   \\M\/M//   \/     \\     DRaySparks@juno.com
 
... I'm Undead, by the way...
--- RemoteAccess 2.50+
---------------