From   Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:29:31
-0800 remote from fanciful.org
Received: by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP Router v5.6.450.61)
          for photo{at}fanciful.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:29:31 -0800
Received: from saf.tzo.com ([140.239.225.181]) HELO=saf.tzo.com
          by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP v5.6.450.61) with SMTP
          id 462617015; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:29:29 -0800
Received: from 64.119.97.218 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2003032619320685999 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:32:06 GMT
Received: by tps-mail.toromontprocess.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
 id ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 17:29:15 -0700
Message-ID:

From: Barbara Lee Spinnenweber 
To: "'photo{at}fanciful.org'" 
Subject: RE: Rights to shoot
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 17:29:36 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C2F3F7.F257FEC0"

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C2F3F7.F257FEC0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset="iso-8859-1"

Carl,
Thanks for sharing this. I printed the flyers and I'll read them over. I've
always been curious on this subject, but haven't really done any research.
For the most part I've managed to stay out of situations, but I've had
occasions where I've been told I wasn't able to take pictures...chemical
plants from ground and inside a casino. I'm sure they are correct and I
wasn't allowed to take the pictures. It'll be good to know in the future to
prevent embarrasing situations - like the casino...whew!
 
Although, I'm sure it would be real easy to bring a camera phone or pen
camera in to places like this...but the quality is gonna suffer.
 
Thanks,
 

Barbara

-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Cook [mailto:clcook{at}olywa.net]
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 9:12 AM
To: photo{at}fanciful.org
Subject: Rights to shoot



Now and then, the subject of "Where is it OK to Shoot" comes up. Here is a
newly published brief by a lawyer on this subject . The author also wrote
the book, Legal Handbook for Photographers. Applies to USA only. 

I would love to see a discussion on how other countries deal with these
issues, especially European countries.

http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm> 

e-mail: clcook{at}olywa.net
http://www.clcookphoto.com http://www.clcookphoto.com/>  


------_=_NextPart_001_01C2F3F7.F257FEC0
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset="iso-8859-1"








Carl,
Thanks 
for sharing this. I printed the flyers and I'll read them over. I've always been 
curious on this subject, but haven't really done any research. For the most part 
I've managed to stay out of situations, but I've had occasions where I've been 
told I wasn't able to take pictures...chemical plants from ground and inside a 
casino. I'm sure they are correct and I wasn't allowed to take the pictures. 
It'll be good to know in the future to prevent embarrasing situations - like the 
casino...whew!
 
Although, I'm sure it would be real easy to bring a camera phone or pen 
camera in to places like this...but the quality is gonna 
suffer.
 
Thanks,
 
Barbara

  -----Original Message-----From: Carl Cook 
  [mailto:clcook{at}olywa.net]Sent: Sunday,
February 09, 2003 9:12 
  AMTo:
photo{at}fanciful.orgSubject: Rights to 
  shoot
  Now and then, the subject of "Where is it OK to Shoot"
comes up. Here is a 
  newly published brief by a lawyer on this subject . The author also wrote the 
  book, Legal Handbook for Photographers. Applies to USA
only. I 
  would love to see a discussion on how other countries deal with these issues, 
  especially European countries.http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm" 
 
eudora="autourl">e-mail" target="new">http://www.krages.com/phoright.htme-mail:

  clcook{at}olywa.nethttp://www.clcookphoto.com/" 
  eudora="autourl">http://www.clcookphoto.com;


------_=_NextPart_001_01C2F3F7.F257FEC0--
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5