Michiel,

With you there is a conspiracy around every corner and everyone has an 
agenda. You've demonstrated your paranoia quite well here today.

> ST> If you can't address the issue and hold a quiet and reasonable
> ST> discussion, you should simply not type replies.
> You mean all who do not agree with you should shut up?

You like to turn every reasonable discussion into an argument and you 
obviously can't have a reasonable discussion.  How sad....

> ST> I'm willing to discuss this issue,
> Sure you are. You would jump at every oportunity to take a swipe at Bj"rn.

You "Assume" too much.  You know what the acronym assume stands for, don't 
you?

> ST> if you want an argument regarding the validity of the absent editor,
> ST> you should complain to him, not me.  My request is reasonable.
> Your "request" is driven by an agenda and as it turned out: premature.

His absence should have been predicated by an Echomail message to us and 
this wouldn't have happened.  The fault is still his Michiel.

Shannon

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a