| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: referendum |
-> I guess 47% are prepared to let the others decide...
Or don't think it makes much difference.
-> Coalitions tend to avoid extremes - if that is 'governing better'.
-> In my view, thorny issues go further back with coalitions than
-> with majority governments...
Not always. The two largest parties here are the Liberals and the
Conservatives. The third-largest is the New Democratic Party, which is
social-democratic. The Greens are fourth. The Conservatives are
definitely on the right of the political spectrum, and the NDP on the
left. The Liberals try to command the centre, which is why they are
often in power. But, a few decades ago when Pierre Trudeau was Prime
Minister, the Liberals won only a minority, and had to make a coalition
with the NDP to govern. The result was that policies well to the left
of the Liberals' usual position were put into effect.
-> DW> There's an empirical rule called the Cube Rule that predicts pretty
-> DW> well how many seats the parties get. The numbers of seats are
-> DW> proportional to the *cubes* of the numbers of votes. If you calculate
-> DW> the numbers of seats this rule predicts with the voting numbers above,
-> DW> they are pretty accurate.
-> It works very well over NZ's voting history, too - but I've never
-> ever managed to get any of our political scientists to give it
-> credence.
It works well in Britain, too, but not in Canada on the federal level.
The reason for that is that there is a party, the Bloc Quebecois,
which is popular in one province, Quebec, but has no support elsewhere.
So it wins a lot of seats in Quebec, even though, on a national level,
its share of the vote is low, such that the cube rule would predict it
would get no seats, or very few. Basically, if there are parties with
localized support, the cube rule fails.
-> Suddenly, we're out of both soccer and rugby worlds and looking
-> succeed at lacrosse (sorry, Lacrossians) or tiddleywinks or
-> summat... :-(
Lacrosse is a good game. It was originally played by North American
"Indians", and is still popular and taken seriously here. NZ would be
welcome to play us, but I bet we'd trounce you.
Incidentally, I'm going to be away for the next 3.5 weeks. Have fun...
dow
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
* Origin: The Bayman BBS,Toronto, (416)698-6573 - 1:250/514 (1:250/514)SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 14/250 300 400 34/999 90/1 120/228 123/500 134/10 140/1 222/2 SEEN-BY: 226/0 229/4000 236/150 249/303 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1411 1418 SEEN-BY: 266/1413 280/1027 320/119 393/68 633/260 262 267 285 712/848 800/432 SEEN-BY: 801/161 189 2222/700 2320/105 200 2800/18 2905/0 @PATH: 250/514 123/500 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.