| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Shades of offensive language WAS Re: Shades of `12 Angry Men (1957) |
Amy Guskin wrote: >>> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:14:40 -0500, Jon Schild wrote > (in article ): > >> >> Cheryl Martin wrote: >>> In article , >>> Andrew Swallow wrote: >>> >>>> Wesley Struebing wrote: >>>> [snip] >>>> >>>> >>>>> By the way, what colors would those "coloureds" be? >>>> The Chinese were yellow and people from the Indian subcontinent >>>> were brown the last time I looked on a London street. >>> >>> Is "coloured" not an offensive term in the UK? (she says noting that >>> today is MLK day here in the US) >>> >>> I'm all sorts of offended by it. Please don't do it again. >>> >>> Cheryl >>> (not "coloured", I was born this shade. No crayons or paints >>> or dyes involved) >>> >> Odd that those who insist on political correctness find "colored" deeply >> offensive, and yet with the other face insist on "people of color" as >> highly correct.<< > > Were you thinking of someone specific? Because Cheryl never mentioned that > she finds the other phrase acceptable. Nor did anyone else here on this > thread. When a word is banned it normally applies to both the present and past tense versions of the word. There is a difference "people of color" is a euphemism for black persons only, a subset of the other group. Andrew Swallow --- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32* Origin: Time Warp of the Future BBS - Home of League 10 (1:14/400) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 14/400 261/38 123/500 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.