TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: babylon5
to: rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated
from: Andrew Swallow
date: 2007-01-24 13:45:32
subject: Re: Shades of offensive language WAS Re: Shades of `12 Angry Men (1957)

Amy Guskin wrote:
>>> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:14:40 -0500, Jon Schild wrote
> (in article ):
> 
>>
>> Cheryl Martin wrote:
>>> In article ,
>>> Andrew Swallow   wrote:
>>>
>>>> Wesley Struebing wrote:
>>>> [snip]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> By the way, what colors would those "coloureds" be?
>>>> The Chinese were yellow and people from the Indian subcontinent
>>>> were brown the last time I looked on a London street.
>>>
>>> Is "coloured" not an offensive term in the UK? (she
says noting that
>>> today is MLK day here in the US)
>>>
>>> I'm all sorts of offended by it.  Please don't do it again.
>>>
>>> Cheryl 
>>> (not "coloured", I was born this shade.  No crayons or paints
>>> or dyes involved)
>>>
>> Odd that those who insist on political correctness find
"colored" deeply 
>> offensive, and yet with the other face insist on "people of
color" as 
>> highly correct.<<
> 
> Were you thinking of someone specific?  Because Cheryl never mentioned that 
> she finds the other phrase acceptable.  Nor did anyone else here on this 
> thread.

When a word is banned it normally applies to both the present and
past tense versions of the word.

There is a difference "people of color" is a euphemism for black
persons only, a subset of the other group.

Andrew Swallow
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32
* Origin: Time Warp of the Future BBS - Home of League 10 (1:14/400)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786
@PATH: 14/400 261/38 123/500 379/1 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.