Hi Michiel!

Tuesday July 18 2006, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Vladimir Donskoy:

 VD>> Are you read unpassword incoming?

 MV> Of course. I accept and process raw *.PKT netmail from anyone. What point
 MV> is there in beinb in the nodelist if one only accepts netmail from a few
 MV> priviliged sources. That is like being listed in the phone book but only
 MV> accept calls from yur friends.

You read netmails personally or by robots?

 MV> If you do not accept mail from at least every nodelisted system, you
 MV> should be listed as a private node or a point.

I _accept_ netmail from any (not only nodelisted systems), but I _read_ it
not every time.
However my robot (FTRACK) alerting me about receive unpassword netmail and
analise it (if this netmail from elections process), but I read it not
every day.

 VD>> At any case easy send mail by establishing password link (by route)
 VD>> with reliable official system (hub)

 MV> What if I do not want your hub to read the mail?

 MV> Besides, I do not have a password with your hub either. What if he does
 MV> the same? I can not have a password with every host and hub in FidoNet.

Sending netmail by unprotecting link your receiver can't sure that this
netmail sending from you and it have not a false.

 VD>> then direct to system without guarantee of reading unprotected
 VD>> incoming by receiver.

 MV> If you only want secure inbound, become a point and accept only mail from
 MV> yur boss.

 VD>>>> Only. Points are free from all rights and obligations too.

 MV>>> So what rights - other than the right to send and receive mail -
 MV>>> does a sysop have?

 VD>> Voting for example.

 MV> Where does it say that sysops have a *right* to vote?

 MV> Sysops do not have voting rights. In some nets and regions there are
 MV> givben the opportunity to vote, but that is all up to the net or region.
 MV> The net or region can extend the same to points. As has been done in some
 MV> regions. denmark f.e.

Time is current... You live at very old time, now other era.

 MV>>>>> And BTW, where *is* Anatoly? AFAIK he is certified ghost.

 VD>>>> He was a sysop who work in Vietname. After his contract was
 VD>>>> finish he return to Moscow.

 MV>>> "Was". his node is off-line....

 VD>> No - his node is working now. He control it by INTERNET.

 MV> So you say....

I have link with his node and I see that temporally troubles on it are
correcting since same days, so - this node have control from sysop.

 MV>>>>> Two plus two still does not equal five no matter how many
 MV>>>>> support that theory...

 VD>>>> Summary two parts of Uran-235 (at same kg each) and you get very
 VD>>>> more bad things...

 MV>>> Put together two masses of 0.5 kg each of U235 and you still end
 MV>>> up with 1 kg of something... provided you included the mass
 MV>>> equivalence of the released energy...

 VD>> 0.5 kg is low, I wrote "same kgs" (I not remember
precise number of
 VD>> critical mass, but it more 10 kgs).

 MV> Are you a physicist?

No, but I learn a phisics at University.

 MV>>> Anyway, your word games are unconvincing. 1+1=2, no matter what
 MV>>> the outcome of the vote.

 VD>> No. "clear mathematic" is only
"theoretical" science, in the real
 VD>> life his results need re-working (re-thinking) before application.

 MV> Whatever. In real life one plus one equals two as well, no matter how many
 MV> word games you play.

This correct only for sample variants, not any cases. I listed there
samples "contra" this.
Lets stop talking about this empty things...

Regards, Vladimir Donskoy

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20060703