On 22/04/2018 21:54, Gareth's Downstairs Computer wrote:
> On 22/04/2018 21:44, druck wrote:
>> On 22/04/2018 12:22, Gareth's Downstairs Computer wrote:
>>> For example, due to operator precedence, parentheses might
>>> prove to be unnecessary, but you'd be justifiably miffed
>>> if they disappeared from the source code, as source code
>>> has human understandabilty considerations, and so
>>> it becomes necessary to
>>> insert a special form of NOP in the compiled code to
>>> represent the parentheses; only one NOP for each pair.
>>
>> No, only the source needs such human readable information, it should
>> not appear in compiled code, or even in the output of hand written
>> assembler.
>
> Not wishing to be rude, but may I suggest that you read this
> thread from the top, for the discussion, in my terms at least,
> is for the source to be the compiled code!

I have, and your intention makes no sense to me regardless of what
architecture it's on.

---druck

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05