TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: os2prog
to: Jonathan Markevich
from: Charles Stephenson
date: 1995-03-16 03:35:04
subject: Re: CA-Realizer

>     Realizer is stand-alone... it's just the FORMS that are not.  It's
 > basically restricted to a MDI interface, and that's no big deal, once you 
 > know
 > what to do.  There's a bit of runtime overhead, in that you actually load
 > Realizer with it, but you have a lot of flexibility in that too.  (Look up
 > EXECUTE in the language guide)

Have you used this yet to make any problems with?  Would it be hard to write 
anything communications-based with it? (say doors, or anything related to it?)


 >     I still say it takes a bit of work to get something running, but it 
 > might
 > still be worth it.  Look at it as a programming language with a forms 
 > designer
 > tacked on, and not as a visual design language.

This I heard.  about how the "DLL" or whatever it is that will be
needed for 
any app written with it is like 700 K's or so.


--- AdeptXBBS v0.92.10wb
* Origin: The New Frontier ][ (216)733-0979 - Akron, OH (1:2215/260)
SEEN-BY: 105/42 620/243 624/50 711/401 409 410 413 430 807 808 809 934 955
SEEN-BY: 712/407 515 628 704 713/888 800/1 7877/2809
@PATH: 2215/12 1 3615/50 396/1 270/101 105/103 42 712/515 711/808 809 934

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.