From: /m 

On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 07:14:03 -0400, "Robert Comer"
 wrote:

>The latter, the signal is in the clear and therefore hackable without
>physical contact.

Yeah, that's why I use WPA/2, it's got 256-bit AES encryption.  While it
isn't hack-proof, it is more than good enough for my home network needs.
Probably good enough for what we do at work also.

 /m

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5