MR>-> Having a monitor for every telephone placed in the police station wou
>-> catch criminals, but it is nevertheless illegal because of constituti
>-> guarantees of personal privacy.
>->
>-> While I'm not so sure I disagree with the use of random license plate
>-> checks, the excuse that "it catches criminals" is not good enough.
>->
>-> Now, as to why I'm not sure I agree that tapping your phone and runni
>-> your license plate is the same thing... I don't see how pulling your
>-> DMV record could reveal any "private" information about you or your
>-> life. I see no way to affect a "police state" by doing so. How coul
>-> running your license plate invade one's privacy?
>Again there is a diffrence in listing in on your phone conversations,
>and merely checking to make sure that the license plate on a car
>actually belongs to it.
Ok.... I'm willing to concede the issue, but not the point. "Because it
catches criminals" is NOT a good reason to enact and enforce any law.
It must be "for the good of society".
As for the issue.... After following this thread for just a few
messages, I find that I agree with Rich Willbanks (one `l', and don't
tell him that I agree with him )... There are many potential abuses
involved in running license plates without probable cause that a crime
has been committed and that the owner/operator of the car was involved.
---
* QMPro 1.02 42-7029 * Why can't you find a tagline when you need one?
--- WILDMAIL!/WC v4.12
1:135/5.0)
---------------
* Origin: CrimeBytes:Take A MegaByte Out Of Crime! (305)592-9831
|