From: "Robert Comer" 

The latter, the signal is in the clear and therefore hackable without
physical contact.

--
Bob Comer


"/m"  wrote in message
news:nfgid2psqnh4hligoa6tgnlj115qs6g9o1{at}4ax.com...
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:53:59 -0400, "Robert Comer"
>  wrote:
>
>>> Do you have that opinion of WPA/2 (a.k.a, 802.11i)?   Or just WEP?
>>
>>Yep, pretty much any wireless comm seems vulnerable.
>
> Do you say that with a specific knowledge of the relative security of
> WEP compared to WPA/2, or do you say that with the concept of "it's
> wireless, therefore it is insecure"?
>
> /m

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5