Hi, Jeff.

JG> On 05-02-95 09:23, Bob Lawrence said to Brenton Vettoretti

JG>  RS>> Doesnt mean there is one here, or that you can work it out by
JG>  RS>> analysing the results as they occur either, by looking for
JG>  RS>> 'patterns'. If you reread your original again it appears to be
JG>  RS>> saying he nicked the random number generator seed, which is a
JG>  RS>> different matter entirely.

JG>  BV>> You've got him. All you've got to do now is reel him
JG>  BV>> in...slowly :)

JG>  BL>   I read my mail yesterday, mostly Rod, and I suddenly thought:
JG>  BL> "What the fuck am I doing?"

JG> Took you long enough.

JG> Do what I do with him. If he is actually discussing something sensibly, the
JG> continue the conversation. If it appears that he's just arguing just for th
JG> hell of it, don't answer him. He might think he's won the discussion, but
JG> who cares.

That's what I do, too.

JG> I'll ocassionaly read his posts to others, but when someone asks where he
JG> got his facts and he refuses to answer, I give up on him. AFA I'm concerned
JG> unsupported facts are just opinions and I've already told him that his
JG> opinions mean less than a good bowel movement to me.

That's what I think, too.

Regards, FIM.

 * * You've got more guts than a road kill.....
@EOT:

---