On Mon, 05 Mar 2001 01:11:55 -0600, pus bonum et laudabile
wrote:
>"Mad Hatter�" wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 04 Mar 2001 12:57:18 -0600, The Queen of Cans and Jars
>> wrote:
>>
>> >"Mad Hatter�" wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, 04 Mar 2001 03:28:54 -0600, The Queen of Cans and Jars
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >"Mad Hatter�" wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Sun, 04 Mar 2001 02:49:11 -0600, The Queen of Cans and Jars
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >"Mad Hatter�" wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> On Sun, 04 Mar 2001 02:09:30 -0600, The Queen of Cans and Jars
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >What's worse, you actually think you can flame.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> What's even worse, you actually think THAT was a flame.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I'm not flamin ya Stupid, I'm just having some fun, at your expense.
>> >> >> >> `, )
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> -Mad Hatter
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >That's good. As long as you realize you are merely playing.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Not only am I playing the music you're dancing to, but I'm also the
>> >> >> one leading you. `, )
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -Mad Hatter
>> >> >
>> >> >Yes, yes. We all know your schtick. In painful detail.
>> >>
>> >> Autoflame grade: A+
>> >>
>> >> Well I'm sorry I've inflicted so much pain on you. Why don't you try
>> >> some Midol, perhaps part of the problem is your PMS, huh Quef? `, )
>> >>
>> >> -Mad Hatter
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Yeah you are pretty damn boring, what with all your lazing about and
>> sighing. Tell me, do you get more interesting, or is this the extent
>> of your being? The big question is whether you would describe
>> yourself more as a process or a function. `, )
>>
>> -Mad Hatter
>Well, Hattrick. If you were the sophisto you claim to be, instead of the
>pretender we know you are, you'd realize that it was a subtle, light poke at
>TQOCAJ, as well as an expression of my exasperation and consternation.
Uh, I hate to point out just how stupid you are, but you just said you
feared me. Moron.
>Now why did I bother pointing that out to you? I'm tired of havng to write your
>flames for you, too.
I'm not quite sure if autoflaming yourself can really be considered as
"writing my flames for me", but hey, whatever blows yer hair back
Tinkerbell. `, )
-Mad Hatter
|