From: "Robert Comer" 

I keep XP and Vista totally separated and put them both on primary
partitions. (so the boot managers don't see each other) and then boot
between them via a utility that comes with bootmagic called pqboot32.

--
Bob Comer


"Rich Gauszka"  wrote in
message news:4560d52b$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>I played with RC2 when I was building this PC now I'm about ready to set up
>a dual-boot XP/Vista setup  ( XP already installed ).  - keeping fingers
>crossed that the Vista boot manager won't become a boot mangler.
>
>
>
> "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
> news:4560bdb7$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>I run Ultimate.
>>
>> --
>> Bob Comer 
>>
>>
>> "Rich Gauszka"  wrote
in message
>> news:456075b4$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> Which Vista?  ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>> "Robert Comer"  wrote
in message
>>> news:45606490$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>> Vista runs just fine in less than 1G...
>>>>
>>>> It's true it takes more machine than XP did, but XP takes
more machine
>>>> than W2K does, as W2K takes machine than NT4 ...
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bob Comer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Geo"  wrote in message
news:455ff848{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>> "Adam"
<""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near the
bridge">
>>>>> wrote in
>>>>> message news:455dc888{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>>
>>>>>> There's bugger all diff till you get to large
memory requirements.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you have a large (many GB) database you want to
operate on in RAM?
>>>>>> Are you doing nuclear simulation or rendering
massive graphics files?
>>>>>
>>>>> Well vista want's 2 gig just to run acceptably, if you
run the beta of
>>>>> the
>>>>> next version of windows you probably need 64 bit just
to load the damn
>>>>> graphics driver..
>>>>>
>>>>> Geo.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5