-=> Tony Langdon wrote to DaiTengu <=-

 TL> nano has been my editor of choice for years.  Sure, in the right hands,
 TL> vi(m) is pretty powerful.  As for Emacs, what little exposure I've had
 TL> to it just didn't make any sense to me.

 TL> I started with pico, when Pine was standard on a lot of systems, then
 TL> switched to nano when Pine fell out of favour due to licensing issues.

I spent years with PINE/ALPINE and pico/nano as my mail and NNTP client. I 
was on sdf.org a few weeks ago, typed PINE and realized they'd sylinked PINE 
to MUTT. Gar!


... Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
--- MultiMail/XT v0.52
 þ Synchronet þ realitycheckBBS -- http://realitycheckBBS.org