From: "Robert Comer" 

I run Ultimate.

--
Bob Comer 


"Rich Gauszka"  wrote in
message news:456075b4$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Which Vista?  ;-)
>
>
> "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
> news:45606490$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Vista runs just fine in less than 1G...
>>
>> It's true it takes more machine than XP did, but XP takes more machine
>> than W2K does, as W2K takes machine than NT4 ...
>>
>> --
>> Bob Comer
>>
>>
>> "Geo"  wrote in message
news:455ff848{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> "Adam"
<""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near the
bridge"> wrote
>>> in
>>> message news:455dc888{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>
>>>> There's bugger all diff till you get to large memory requirements.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have a large (many GB) database you want to operate
on in RAM?
>>>> Are you doing nuclear simulation or rendering massive
graphics files?
>>>
>>> Well vista want's 2 gig just to run acceptably, if you run the beta of
>>> the
>>> next version of windows you probably need 64 bit just to load the damn
>>> graphics driver..
>>>
>>> Geo.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5