From: "Rich Gauszka" 

Which Vista?  ;-)


"Robert Comer"  wrote in message
news:45606490$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Vista runs just fine in less than 1G...
>
> It's true it takes more machine than XP did, but XP takes more machine
> than W2K does, as W2K takes machine than NT4 ...
>
> --
> Bob Comer
>
>
> "Geo"  wrote in message
news:455ff848{at}w3.nls.net...
>> "Adam"
<""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near the
bridge"> wrote
>> in
>> message news:455dc888{at}w3.nls.net...
>>
>>> There's bugger all diff till you get to large memory requirements.
>>>
>>> Do you have a large (many GB) database you want to operate on in RAM?
>>> Are you doing nuclear simulation or rendering massive graphics files?
>>
>> Well vista want's 2 gig just to run acceptably, if you run the beta of
>> the
>> next version of windows you probably need 64 bit just to load the damn
>> graphics driver..
>>
>> Geo.
>>
>>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5