| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: 64-bit anyone |
From: "Frank Haber" BobC gave you one soothing answer. Another, probably equally safe answer: It will gain you nothing for a while; might even cost you some with some software. Eventually, it'll gain you lots. You get to choose when you get on the bus. This is better than Communism, yes? Looking at the other side of it, I remember when people actually said, in 1982, "Why move eight extra bits around when it's all just character data anyway, one byte at a time? That's right, they were complaining about the 8086 and 68000. I can think of four or five reasons off the top of my head why the above statement is, well, just monumentally pinheaded. Then there's Gates and "640k is more than enough." What may take the cake is a peace of Remington (Rand) puffery ca. 1952 that I once read*. It implied that no computer could be a real computer unless it used a shared address space for data and code. In other words, some boffin had convinced the publicist that self-modifying code was an architectural requirement for a "real computer." No evidence, but I'm pretty positive, since I had a discussion about it with an RCA computer engineer, round about 1960, and he remembered the same brochure, and laughed along with me. --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.