BJ> I've recently been sending files as attachments to netmail in 
 BJ> Maximus, with Squish handling the mail packing.  I'm sticking in the 
 BJ> full path in the netmail that I write.  Once squish is done, the 
 BJ> netmail viewable on the BBS shows that the path has been stripped, 
 BJ> and squish has properly set the path for sending out the file.
 JD> You checked the .flo file, then.

Yes.  Actually a .clo file, but yes....

 JD> Whomever you are sending them too...  he wouldn't be 
 JD> the middle man for you, such that you are routing 
 JD> netmails w/file attached through him, would he?
 JD> :)

Unfortunately, this is not testing routing files thru a third party.  But
it does tell me that squish is changing the path is the message.  I need to
contact the other party to make sure the path is edited before squish is
packing the message for sending, but I believe it is, since the message
left on my system is edited on the subject line....  So, this isn't a
complete test of file forwarding.....  But that may come shortly.....

[Ok, Bo....  When you received the netmail with the file attached, what was
the subject line?  Just the file name?  Or was a full path specified?] 


Take care.....

Bob Jones, 1:343/41


--- Maximus/2 3.01