From: "Geo" 

"mike"  wrote in message
news:e0esl2dlfv1obmis8lqrc6s9lj7lppnkvs{at}4ax.com...

> Spam filters are CPU-intensive.  But other than that, you are quite
> correct.

Spam filters *can* be cpu intensive, especially dumb ones that scan more
than say the first 10k of each email.

But even for a 1000 employee company, unless they are doing bulk email my
laptop would be sufficient to handle their email needs, except for the slow
disk drive.

Geo.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5