On (02 Apr 98) James Mckenzie wrote to John Faerber...
 JF> My feeling is that you should be able to take it off if you so desire,
 JF> but if a person is injured as a result, then they cannot sue for
 JF> damages.
 JM> One question, what if that person injures another?  That is why the
 JM> rule was enacted from my viewpoint (JAL flight where one was killed in
 JM> flight.)
 I wouldn't think there would be any prohibition against the injured
 party suing the non-complying one...
 JF> Would this seem to be a fair rule?
 JM> Not at the present.
 I think it would...
... If I used taglines, I would steal this one.
--- PPoint 2.05
---------------