PE> Not that I've seen.  I'll see if I can dredge up some older ones.

FM> Let me know if you do. It shouldn't make any difference for CHESS

I found the CHESS statements for when I converted the BT stuff, but there
was no PDP.  This is probably my first PDP CHESS statement.

FM> reason that I can find out. An accompanying message said "ask your
FM> broker" - who do *I* ask? :-)

Yeah, I know that feeling.

PE> I was selling those PDP around the same time as getting transferred to
PE> Chess.  Maybe that screwed them up?  BFN.  Paul.

FM> Almost certainly that's what caused the 400.

Well, it's a very strange thing, BT sending in a stupid certificate when
they had one exactly the right size.  In addition, the BT holding statement
makes it look like they sent in the RIGHT one.  So it's very strange that
400 should appear out of nowhere.  BTW, if the end result is that I've got
400 shares for free, I'm not particularly interested in reporting the
problem.  That's their job to not stuff that up.

FM> I'll get back on to this next week. Oh, do you have a client reference
FM> number for BT? I may have it at work, but just to be sure. Something
FM> like EDWARP 12345 6

Sent in netmail.  BTW, you said somewhere to send in the 400 shares to get
them CHESSed, but I will actually be sending them to BT to get them CHESSed
instead, because it goes onto my margin.  BFN.  Paul. 
@EOT:

---