From: "Bill Mattox" 

"Bill Lucy"  wrote in message
news:MPG.137a6e15b1eabfa3989819{at}news.barkto.com...
> In article , billy-m{at}pacbell.net says...
> > You've been making definitive statements on why the government was
justified
> > in their actions, yet did not seem to know much about the warrant that
> > authorized it. I was beginning to get a little suspicious as to how deep
> > that lack of knowledge went.
>
> And I keep telling you the INS did not even *need* a warrant.
>

Oddly enough, it looks as though it is now becoming deja vu all over again.
(I know, I know, you were ahead of your time)

Clinton apologists spent the first couple of days making excuses for a
warrantless armed raid in the early morning hours. Once it had been
definitively shown that a warrant actually existed, the demonizing media
spin directed from the WH turned to accusations against accusers for making
unsubstantiated charges and much hay was made over the fact that proper
legal procedures had been followed. When that warrant began to look more
than a little suspicious in its own right, knee-jerk apologists on the Left
reverted back to claiming that it was unnecessary all along.

Matters are getting curiouser and curiouser.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5