From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C280EB.88A26850
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   If you have Windows 95 installed on your seven year old computer =
doing the same things you did seven years ago, you are absolutely right. =
 If you are using new hardware, new software, or otherwise using it in =
new ways then you may very well have issues with seven year old = operating system.

Rich

  "Tony Ingenoso"  wrote in message =
news:3dc1a3f1{at}w3.nls.net...
  So? BFD.  Most people don't throw away their cars every year or two =
and buy new ones, why should they throw away their software
  investments?  If they're still on Win95 and its working OK why change? =
 Other than intentionally induced version checking
  incompatibilities, there's not much that won't run on Win95 that runs =
on 98/ME.

  Bits don't rot - they run as well today as they did on the day of =
release.

  "Brian"  wrote in message =
news:3dc13584$1{at}w3.nls.net...
  >
  > If you're still on 95...it's time to get with the program. Fer =
chrissakes
  > it's Win*95*....7+year old OS!



------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C280EB.88A26850
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








   If you
have Windows 95 =
installed on=20
your seven year old computer doing the same things you did seven years = ago, you=20
are absolutely right.  If you are using new hardware, new software, = or=20
otherwise using it in new ways then you may very well have issues with = seven=20
year old operating system.
 
Rich
 

  "Tony Ingenoso" <tonyiNOSPAM{at}attglobal.net&g=">mailto:tonyiNOSPAM{at}attglobal.net">tonyiNOSPAM{at}attglobal.net&g=
t;=20
  wrote in message news:3dc1a3f1{at}w3.nls.net...So=
?=20
  BFD.  Most people don't throw away their cars every year or two =
and buy=20
  new ones, why should they throw away their =
softwareinvestments?  If=20
  they're still on Win95 and its working OK why change?  Other than =

  intentionally induced version checkingincompatibilities, there's =
not much=20
  that won't run on Win95 that runs on 98/ME.Bits don't rot - =
they run=20
  as well today as they did on the day of
release."Brian" <Witch*Dr{at}usa.nojunkemail.=">mailto:Witch*Dr{at}usa.nojunkemail.net.ru">Witch*Dr{at}usa.nojunkemail.=
net.ru>=20
  wrote in message news:3dc13584$1{at}w3.nls.net...=
>>=20
  If you're still on 95...it's time to get with the program. Fer=20
  chrissakes> it's Win*95*....7+year old=20
OS!

------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C280EB.88A26850--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4