Richard Town writes:
 JP> (April 27, issue).  There was a similar situation with v.fc and v.34.
 JP> Most Rockwell modems upgraded to v.34 did not have the v.fc code after
 JP> the upgrade and I think this was a ROM/PROM chip and not FlashRAM.
 RT> Name brand Rockwell product ceased V.FC support with the 
 RT> upgrade to V34Plus
 RT> not V34 (which still retained V.FC)  Supra still supported V.FC even 
ith
 RT> V34Plus and after they moved over to V34+   Reason being that V80 H324
 RT> VideoPhone mode was added, and no further development work 
 RT> was done on V.FC
 RT> (3200 max symbol rate, symmetric, max 28k8)
Thanks for your detailed reply although quite unnecessary as I wrote "most 
Rockwell modems" (please read the quote above).
 RT> Does this-oh-so-impartial paragon of journalistic integrity inform
 RT> you of this?
No need to do so.  Those details were not relevant to his point.  OTOH, It 
takes one "oh-so-impartial paragon" to know another. Right, Richard? 
 RT> rgdZ :)
 RT> Richard
Regards to you, too.
        -John-
--- EZPoint V2.2
---------------