* All Said to, Gerson Lage something like:
 GL> FACE ON MARS EQUALS SHROUD OF TURINE
 GL> Tests on The famous Shroud of Christ solved it was painted. But it
 GL> seemed to be impossible for people from the middle-age to paint a
 GL> linen shroud with such high detail. Eg the thumb which was bend to
 GL> inside. When we take the negative of the painting, it forms a
 GL> 3-dimensional object. Quite impossible to make for people of that
 GL> time.
 Having already determined nothing mystical in the way the object was 
produced (ie. paint on linen), I serously doubt it really 'impossible' to 
produce the object in it time.  What was it dated again? 
 GL> I saw this on Discovery Channel and it seemed still a mistery. When
 GL> I saw this 3-dimensonal computerscan of the face I was shocked. It
 GL> looked exactly like the famous Face on Mars.
Speculation based on the statement that the face is 'impossible' to produce. 
Remember it was once claimed that no paint was used.  The object is very 
human, yet people still can not stop covering it in religious baggage. 
 GL> Conclusion:
 GL> The Face on Mars is the face of Christ. It was made by the same
 GL> beings as who painted the Shroud of Christ: extraterrestials.
 GL> (My other theories already said Angels are ET's). We'll see in the
 GL> future why they did this.
Your jumping the gun here.  Firstly, both are based on extremely shaky 
foundations.  There is no way you could disprove that the 'face of Mars' is 
merely a rock formation.  The pictures I saw of it were not very sharp and 
the required magnification only made things worse.  Why do you think people 
what NASA to fly by the area again and takes some better pictures? 
--- FMail 1.22
---------------