MP>JK>BM> I beg to differ Jane.  As you should, but probably don't, recall
MP>JK>BM> chapter and verse on a number of studies debunking diet have been
MP>JK>BM> provided to you.  That you choose to pooh-pooh them is your
MP>JK>BM> problem. The opinions of your correspondents carry no credibility
MP>JK>BM> unless they have appeared in a peer reviewed journal.
MP>JK>The point is that I can provide an equal amount of studies which say
MP>JK>that those studies are nonsense.
MP>No, you cannot do that. An **equal amount** does not exist. For every
MP>study that I found that supports the diet theory, there are several
MP>studies that refute it, and show how those studies were flawed.
More or less what I said except that you still believe diet is nonsense.
Your viewpoint is being erradicated by common sense wheverver folks will
sit still long enough to learn better.
---
 þ SLMR 2.1a þ Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
---------------