Received: from saf.tzo.com ([140.239.225.181])
 by fanciful.org (wcSMTP v5.6.450.3)
 with SMTP id 493470250; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 16:51:40 -0800
Received: from 195.112.155.162 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2003021419523150066 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Sat, 15 Feb 2003 00:52:31 GMT
Received: from isdn04156.ada.net.tr (isdn04156.ada.net.tr [195.112.156.156])
 by mail.ada.com.tr (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h1F6p2Jj020014
 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 08:51:02 +0200
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 02:50:36 +0200
From: ayse saray 
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) Personal
Reply-To: ayse saray 
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: 
To: "terry.vernon{at}fanciful.org" 
Subject: Re: New PhotoSIG Pictures
In-Reply-To: 
References: 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


tvfo> There's no alternative when the brightness range of the subject 
tvfo> exceeds the ability of the film or sensor to record it.
tvfo> I always had this problem when shooting planes in flight;
tvfo> fortunately, no one expected to see much detail in sky.
tvfo> Darkroom/digital after-work is the only solution...

a friend of mine has an "agrandisor" (do you say so?) with a diffusor
(not condensator) and she gets very detailed results even with white
on white or black on black while printing at the darkroom. but she
does not use digital camera. i don't know if ps has such a feature.


--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5