Hello Cindy.

27 Oct 06 12:30, you wrote to me:

 CH> 0n (20 Oct 06) Jeff Smith wrote to Cindy Haglund...

 JS>> Hello Cindy.

 JS>> 20 Oct 06 12:50, you wrote to me:

 JS>  JS>>> I didn't catch any fish today, but at least I got sex.



 CH>>  Yo Jeff? I don't know why but last time I left someone's origin
 CH>> line in a reply, in an echo elsewhere, I got hollered at by the
 CH>> Moderator. I don't know why but it's supposed to be bad to do.
 CH>> Again I don't know why. Anybody know why? I'd like to know. Not
 CH>> to be a pain in the butt, but simply as I'm curious and like
 CH>> knowing why.

 JS>>      I would quess that some might consider it excessive quoting.


 CH>  PING! That's it! Funny story. The same sort who scream if you post is
 CH> 'too long' but then they go ahead and post something twice as long. Go
 CH>  figure!


     The term double-standards comes to mind but I will resist going down that
path just now. 


 CH>  That's a weird thing about some people. They assume anyting that
 CH> isn't right by them to do only applies to others. And they think their
 CH> opinions are facts and everybody eles facts are opinions. I'm never
 CH> going to figure them out. I quit trying and feel much better!!


     I try to go by a few basic principles. Say what you mean as best you can
and mean what you say. And secondly, try to treat others the same way that you
would like to be treated. Now I don't claim to always succeed but I try to
the best of my abilities. There will always be some that will dislike you
or what you do regardless. But if I am secure that I have done my best then
I am content with that. And the few that may still have a problem with me
can
kiss my... ummm... wrist. 

 JS>> Can't say for sure. I normally don't edit or alter when quoting
 JS>> as some also frown on that. Pretty much whatever one does there
 JS>> will be those that either like or dislike it

 CH>   I'm glad we don't do that top quoting common in INet groups. UNless
 CH> it's a very short quote to which your reply is equally short.


     I would agree. It would be like quoting header and path lines here on
every message. If your refering to a particular path then fine. Otherwise
what
is the point or necsessity?

 CH> Cinders

 CH> ... Feather by feather the goose is plucked.

 CH> --- PPoint 3.01

Jeff

--- FMail/Win32 1.60