Received: from saf.tzo.com ([140.239.225.181])
 by fanciful.org (wcSMTP v5.6.450.3)
 with SMTP id 73301968; Sun, 09 Feb 2003 20:08:53 -0800
Received: from 216.174.194.62 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2003020910134421823 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Sun, 09 Feb 2003 15:13:44 GMT
Received: (qmail 23478 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2003 15:12:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Carl?Cook.olywa.net) (64.42.61.58)
  by queue.atgi.net with SMTP; 9 Feb 2003 15:12:13 -0000
Message-Id: 
X-Sender: clcook{at}mail.olywa.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 07:12:18 -0800
To: 
From: Carl Cook 
Subject: Rights to shoot
In-Reply-To: 
References: 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="=====================_2193790==_.ALT"

--=====================_2193790==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed



Now and then, the subject of "Where is it OK to Shoot" comes up. Here is a 
newly published brief by a lawyer on this subject . The author also wrote 
the book, Legal Handbook for Photographers. Applies to USA only.

I would love to see a discussion on how other countries deal with these 
issues, especially European countries.

http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm

e-mail: clcook{at}olywa.net
http://www.clcookphoto.com
--=====================_2193790==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"



Now and then, the subject of "Where is it OK to Shoot" comes
up. Here is a newly published brief by a lawyer on this subject . The
author also wrote the book, Legal Handbook for Photographers.
Applies to USA only. 
I would love to see a discussion on how other countries deal with these
issues, especially European countries.
http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm"
eudora="autourl">http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm;
e-mail: clcook{at}olywa.net
http://www.clcookphoto.com/"
eudora="autourl">http://www.clcookphoto.com;

--=====================_2193790==_.ALT--

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5