> Watcom,  on other hand,  which has its roots as a compiler that runs in 640k
> dos,  runs very very well in 8mb.   (I am currently pissed off at Watcom
> though,  for their new unacceptable support policy.   Even complaining about
> the policy costs money!)

I have nothing AGAINST cset, watcom, or borland.  But I LIKE emx, and,
let's face it, it's free.  Why should I spend money on the others when what
I've got is debugged better than the other three combined?

Rob
 
--- Xblat