>>> Part 1 of 2...
-=> On 12-27-97 01:41, Rob Dennis said to Ivy Iverson,<=-
-=>"About Jammer hunting - Thanks!...,"<=-
Hi, Rob;
...
RD> It is something I put together after 4 months straight of jamming and
RD> crap on the local repeaters here. It helped to nail one pain in the
RD> butt and put fear into several others.
Well deserved! (Hopefully it went all the way to terror!) :-}
RD> Now with APRS DF-ing is easier to do with one stationary point
RD> and several mobiles using the APRS software to nail the twit.
That should be a more efficent way of tracking them. There are a few
Hams in this area that are playing with GPS and APRS, but I think the
main tracking tools around here at this time are directional antennas,
including a couple of handi-finders. (I am hoping to build a handi-finder
for myself).
RD> I'm still playing with the APRS software,but only for the DF part of
RD> it for now as I do not have a GPS unit yet.
Prices are coming down. The first ads I saw for them had price tags of
several hundred dollars. Recently I saw one for, (IIRC), around $125.00.
II> Strange thing happened about a week ago, though. I happened to be
II> listening around to out of town repeaters, and I heard someone local
II> trying to jam a conversation on the OUTPUT of a machine perhaps 40 miles
II> away. It obviously wasn't bothering them ome bit, so I switched to
RD> Sounds like you have a stolen or "found" radio in the hands of a
RD> someone who has no idea of how a repeater really works.
This is quite possible in this case, but that is not how our local jammer
works. (It could be a copy-cat). The main jammer hereabouts has a dual
band, probably a mobile, with crossband repeat, and has used it to lock
up both the 444.175 and the 147.06 machnes by crossband repeating when
the link is on: set it up to crossband repeat and walk away. The first
person that keys either repeater sends it locks up both machines, one of
which is the main 2M machine for the county, and carries probably 90% of
all repeater traffic here.
RD> He/she/it has probably figured that since they can only hear one of
RD> the people talking so toss a carrier to jam the other person listening.
RD> Commonly called the cb-mentality.
Actually, both sides were coming in equally strong, (being a repeater
output.) IMO, the average CBer doesn't have the brains to pound sand
down a rat hole when it comes to the technology which Hams take for
granted.
II> simplex and said something like, "You aren't bothering them one bit, but
II> you are sure showing YOUR stupidity. This is KB9QPM, and you don't have
II> the GONADS to give YOUR call!" Amazingly enough, not only did that
II> jamming attempt stop instantly, but I haven't heard any on the local
II> machines since then either! Maybe it was enough of a shock to
im/her/it
II> enough to pound a little sense into their thick skull! I doubt that it
RD> Probably scared the crap right out of them when they heard someone
RD> else on their "private" channel talking right at them.
RD> Several times I've heard yo-yos blabbering away on 10m AM(!) with
RD> Roger-beeps at 28.045 up to 28.325 and they freak when someone comes on
RD> and asks them for a callsign.
Interesting question: What happens if the FCC hears about a legitimate
Ham using AM to tell a CBer to give a call... in the CW segment of 10?
I would be more inclined to load up all the power I had, point the beam
right down the children's throats, and start calling CQ on CW. If they
move to another frequency in the CW segment, just follow them! They just
MIGHT get the idea that it's not real friendly terratory for them, and
I, (the legal Ham), am perfectly within MY rights to be using that
frequency in CW mode! What do you think the FCC would say if some dumb
Chickenbander calls 'em up and says, "Somebody was interfering with our
conversation on the radio." "What frequency?" sez Mr. FCC. The
birdbrain replies, "28.050," (or Channel 56 or whatever it would be).
"And what's your callsign?" "This is Skipmaster," replies the dumbo.
"Ok, what's your address... We'll be right over." replies the FCC
representitive. Heh heh... Something I'd LOVE to see happen, and it
would qualify for the TV show: "America's DUMBEST Criminals!" ROTFL!
RD> They seem to think they are in a "private" frequency area on their
RD> radios that no-one else has and it scares them when someone DOES show
RD> up. Same as the clowns who got their hands on 440Mhz business band
RD> radios that had been modified for amateur use and started a "club" on a
RD> 440 simplex freq here. They got a BIG surprise when someone broke in
RD> asking for a callsign after they heard a conversation about tearing
RD> down some guy's antenna!
I'm surprised that they weren't challanged for callsigns as soon as they
showed up on the frequency!
...
RD> 70 percent of those who jam are -bored $h!tless- with what or whom
RD> they listen too,so decide to "spice" things up by trashing a repeater
RD> and forcing people off it. (makes them feel `big' ego wise)
RD> The leftover 30 percent have an axe to grind with one particular
RD> group or one person and trash the repeater only when their favourite
RD> traget is on the air. (commonly known as: get the local bucket-mouth
RD> off the air)
Says the ratchet-jaw, right? (NOT talking about you!) :-}
Seriously, though, I think our principal antaginist is a member of the
30% group. He/she/it seems to have two axes to grind: One particular
Ham and the 2M/440 link, (which he has pretty well caused to be shut
down most of the time now).
RD> 100 percent of those caught red faced / handed DENY doing
RD> the jamming and may/will attempt to lay the blame on someone else
RD> entirely.
Of course! If they are errant CBers they just know that they are in the
wrong and will try to avoid the consequences, but if they are licensed
Hams, they KNOW how stiff the consequences can be! (Like a $2,000 fine
>>> Continued to next message...
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20 [NR]
--- TriToss (tm) 1.03 - (Unregistered)
---------------
* Origin: Ivy's WALL BBS - Sheboygan, WI 920-457-9255 (1:154/170)
|