Hello Roger.

11 Nov 06 08:01, you wrote to Malte Schmidt:

 RN> ­Hola!

 RN> Malte Schmidt wrote in a message to Roger Nelson:

 MS>> Buenos dĦas Roger!

 RN> ¨Como esta?

 MS>> "Danke" (or "Vielen Dank!")

 RN> Sorry, I must have run out of the letter e.  (-:

 MS>> De nada

 RN> No problemo.

 MS>> Well, not necessarily her. As long as it is a Democrat. From my
 MS>> perspective Clinton is just the likeliest candidate, that's all.

 RN> The wife of the President who brought shame to himself and the office
 RN> he held?  Mo way she gets elected.  Voters may be blind, but they are
 RN> not stupid.


     I would venture to say that some politicians depend on voters being both
blind and stupid. In Hilary's case I would choose to avoid associating Bill's
actions with Hilary. I would look at Hilary and what she stands for as an
individual. Which by the way I do not care for. Of course others may not
look at it that way.


 MS>> Now they begin here to hope that the foreign politics of the USA
 MS>> will change to the better and they start working together with
 MS>> Europe again because of the pressure of the Democrats.

 RN> How will that benefit the countries who turned a blind eye to what is
 RN> going on in the middle east?

 MS>> I fear I am not joking. It is unfair, I know. But at the moment,
 MS>> one has to be an American to vote. :-)

 RN> That sounds like you're for one government for every nation on the
 RN> planet.  Because of the qualities and other things inherent in people
 RN> of all cultures and nationalities, that is something we won't see in
 RN> our lifetime.  The U.N. is a case in point.


     The UN is pretty much useless. The reason being that the member nations
can't let go of their own agenda's long enough to allow anything positve
to be accomplished. Which leaves the UN pretty much toothless in any situation
that it may participate in.


 RN> Gruesse,

 RN> Roger
 RN> --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+

Jeff

--- FMail/Win32 1.60