John Giannini wrote in a message to All:
JG> Why can't the people that have the current code for OPUS
JG> just release an *intermediate* version of OPUS.EXE to fix
JG> some obvious problems? For example, releasing a version of
JG> OPUS.EXE (1.73b?) where Opus would simply **recognize** 28.8
JG> and 33.6 callers, and calculate download times correctly,
JG> accordingly, would be a VAST improvement! Such a small
JG> change wouldn't take hardly *any* time at ALL to code, but
JG> would be of enormous benefit to everyone! Indeed, it
JG> probably wouldn't take any coding at all, just slightly
JG> modifying existing code!
This is the only thing about OPUS that bothers me. It doesn't bother me as
much as you, as I only go 16.8 and I don't have many files over 1 meg to D/l,
so it's mostly a "cosmetic" thing for me, but I agree with you on your point,
but then, not many people run OPUS Barefoot anymore.
JG> Signed - a person *JUST ABOUT* to jump to
JG> Maximus!
Signed - a person too damned lazy to switch to Max.
Jack
--- timEd/2-B11
---------------
* Origin: Jack's Free Lunch 4OS2 USR16.8 Pgh Pa (412)492-0822 (1:129/171)
|