wrote in message news:t02sq9t5ljpm6nsd95nn7mkp19bralt9fu@4ax.com...
>
>>On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:13:22 -0400, Ron  wrote:
>
>>On 6/27/2014 6:03 PM, charliec@email.com wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:09:01 +0200, FredW  
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:17:44 -0700, charliec@email.com wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 13:24:58 +0200, FredW  
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have the current "Paid" version of MBAM, but do not run it in real 
>>>>>>> time.  I
>>>>>>> use it to do manual scans when I feel like it (about once a week). 
>>>>>>> I have NAV
>>>>>>> that I run in real time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1.If you use MBAM only for an occasional scan, you don't need the 
>>>>>> paid
>>>>>> version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. so your NAV did not stop and remove the intruder, you had to use 
>>>>>> MBAM
>>>>>> to do so.
>>>>>
>>>>> NAV did halt the installation and advised me to not continue and 
>>>>> uninstall
>>>>> anything there using Control Panel, which I did.  I did ran MBAM to 
>>>>> clean out
>>>>> anything left.
>>>>
>>>> NAV did not prevent installation of the intruder, MBAM might have.
>>>
>>> When anything is being installed, NAV tells if it is safe or not!
>>
>>Some people are still living in the past when Norton was a resource hog
>>and basically a POS antivirus program. They continue to bash the product
>>because of it's history...not their actual use.
>
>Good Point!

Well, it sure did a good job on Optimizer Pro, didn't it. Norton is still 
highly rated today, overall.
Charlie, you can run MBAM Pro in real time with Norton with no slow downs, 
etc.
Try it!

-- 
Buffalo 

--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2