Jeffrey Kaplan wrote:
> Previously on rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated, Kathryn Huxtable said:
> 
>>> IIRC, wasn't B5 supposed to be at a Lagrange point?
>> Dunno. It was in orbit around Epsilon III, which would imply the 
>> existence of a moon somewhere. I don't recall a moon being mentioned...
> 
> Merely being having a space station in orbit of a planet does not imply
> the existence of a moon.  If it was specified that the station was in a
> Lagrange point, that would imply a moon.

   Not necessarily. Could be the L1 point with the star. (There was a star 
around there somewhere, wasn't it?) Was the distance from B5 to the planet ever 
mentioned?

-- 
No, no, you can't e-mail me with the nono.
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32