G'day Bob,

On Mar 08 07:57 95, Bob Lawrence wrote to Jeff Green :

JG>> How was it meant to work?

BL> I originally intended to just skip the faulty message and 
BL> process the rest of the packet, but it gets a bit hairy 
BL> trying to double-guess what might have gone wrong.

Don't all messages have a definite beginning and ending. That should 
stop any problems occurring on the messages that follow the faulty 
one. Of course, two faults in a row could make things a bit hairy.

BL> I work on 10%. If I can understand 10% of what I read, I 
BL> reckon that's close enough.

But you answer 30% of the mail :-)
 
Regards...Jeff
Internet: jeff{at}grntrs.dialix.oz.au

... Sandwich: A faulty attempt to make both ends meat.
 
@EOT:

--- Msgedsq/2 2.3 alpha