PS> allow for labels when using
 PR> inline asm ?

 PS> Some third-party code I have that I recompiled under 
 PS> BC++/2 uses labels in its inline asm, and worked, so the answer is yes.

Damn fine!! There were times I would of paid twice the price of the 3.1
compiler just for that one litte thing...I'm a big fan of IBM asm
programming (the only one that's challenging ).

 PS> are expensive, but so's everything nowadays. Besides, I 
 PS> was able to special-order mine direct from Borland for 
 PS> only $199.95CDN (complete package, first time) so I 
 PS> don't care.  :-)
Just for future savings... How exactly does one go about doing that? Can anyone?

 PS> Anyhow, In the short time I've been using it, I haven't found any cause 
 PS> to complain.  Sure there a couple of minor bugs in the 
 PS> IDE, but DOS version has bugs too.  Everything in that 

Have you noticed any bugs that threw you for a loop ? I don't wanna spend
the time messing with something if I can find out in advance it's a bug...
Messed with reading fp. numbers from files for half a day before saw tiny
sentence in manual explaining that bug...

 PS> package has worked solidly for me and I do not mind 
 PS> allocating the needed 70MB of HD space for the entire 
...damn, I was kinda hoping the installation program would allocate the
space for me ...
 PS> package.  TDGX/2 (Turbo Debugger) is absolutely 
 PS> amazing, and the IDE debugger is equally as helpful.  
mouth watering... Well, after the borland knocks I've read, it's refreshing
to see someone's happy with it, as I've allready ordered it... supposed to
be in tuesday now...
        How is it in calgary now ? It's still kinda chilly here in the
nations's capitol.
                Paul Rider...

--- Maximus/2 2.02