| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Newbie code |
Richard Hulme wrote in a message to Mike Bilow: MB> You should also observe the proper case format for OS/2 API calls. Most MB> of them, and all of the ones you are using here, are defined to use the MB> pascal calling convention (APIENTRY) which forces the names to upper case RH> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ RH> Actually, only the 16-bit API calls (VioXXXXX, MouXXXXX RH> etc.) are defined to use the pascal calling convention. All RH> the 32-bit API calls are defined to use the syscall (or RH> 'system' depending on your compiler) calling convention RH> which is more than slightly different :-) This issue seems to have taken on a life of its own. The original question was about case sensitivity in writing the API names in C source. If the API names are written in all caps in C source, then subtle bugs can result. The point was that the compiler will not see the function prototypes from OS2.H, but that the linker is going to link the functions successfully anyway. All system APIs -- and by that I mean all of the APIs defined by OS/2 itself, even those with "32" in their names -- are actually exported in all caps. -- Mike ---* Origin: N1BEE BBS +1 401 944 8498 V.34/V.FC/V.32bis/HST16.8 (1:323/107) SEEN-BY: 105/42 620/243 711/401 409 410 413 430 807 808 809 934 955 712/407 SEEN-BY: 712/515 628 704 713/888 800/1 7877/2809 @PATH: 323/107 150 3615/50 396/1 270/101 105/103 42 712/515 711/808 809 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.