Hello Paul!

16 Oct 04 08:38, David Drummond wrote to Paul Quinn:

 PQ>>>> In our case, I would accept either 'node' or 'system' as a
 PQ>>>> member of Fidonet.

 VD>>> The second my case? I include "system" on term
"node" on this case.

 PQ>> To my way of thinking: "system"=="node". 
Please don't confuse
 PQ>> (current) capacity with (future) capability.  Besides, there have to
 PQ>> be 'leaf' nodes.  True?  :)

 DD> It sounds as if in Vladimir's neck of the woods there are no leaf nodes,
 DD> they're points...

Yes, in my 2-nd case nodes with only 1 link is really - points! And only if
their NC decide what it is good for network - he may legalize it as
(example analogue PVT) node.

Vladimir Donskoy.

--- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-040321