| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | 2 `Which C++ Compiler?` |
RL> Hmmm... I'm just wondering if all this crud would RL> be particularly compatible with EMX. I'm writing Somehowtt i doub it. From what I've heard of EMX, it's libraries try to make sockets and file handles look the same, as they are under Unix. Under OS/2, they're not, so the socket libraries for EMX have an interface that's slightly different from IBM's. IBM's X Client kit is of course written for their own socket interface. If you're trying to port a genuine Unix X Client library, I suppose you'd have an easier time with EMX if the bugs don't get you (I'm not trying to imply that EMX has too many bugs - I don't know - but it wouldn't suprise me if EMX were less robust). Academic interest aside, for me it's not worth the effort to reproduce what IBM's already done. --- Maximus/2 2.02p1* Origin: Sol 3 * Toronto * V.32 * (905)858-8488 (1:259/414) SEEN-BY: 105/42 620/243 711/401 409 410 413 430 807 808 809 934 955 712/407 SEEN-BY: 712/515 628 704 713/888 800/1 7877/2809 @PATH: 259/414 400 99 250/702 3615/50 396/1 270/101 105/103 42 712/515 @PATH: 711/808 809 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.