Hi Darin,
 > Bill, you have to read the rest of the message I was
 > responding to:
    I did. I covered all the actual options available, if you read *my* 
ply.
    Obviously we read it differently. That just means it was a very
ambiguous message - nothing more. Do you think we can now drop it?
    I know of no reliable way to determine the size of an array outside its 
scope, so I could not help with his wish list. Hence no reply on that 
particular.
Bill.
---
---------------