Maurice,

On Monday November 03 2014 07:41, you wrote to Bj”rn Felten:

 MK> I have on many, many occasions the latest being to either rewrite it
 MK> or religate it to the bitbucket never to be seen again.  Also I
 MK> suggested that the author be taken out back to the woodshed while the
 MK> powers that be deal with the obvious mess it has created (eg Golded+).

Yes, you have brought it up many times, to the point of becoming a PITA.

The answer to the question you raise in the subject is "it will never be fixed
because it is not broken." The FTSC documents current practise and current
practice in FIDONET iS that positive offsets are NOT prefixed with a '+'. 
FTS-4008 correctly documents this current practise.

The fact that others outside Fdidonet do it different is of no consequence. The
FTSC documents Fidonet. The fact that you disagree with that is also of no
consequence.

It will not be fixed because it is not broken. Hence it is not an issue that
requires interaction between the FTSC and the Fidonet community. It is
therefore off-topic.

You have been asked several time to drop this issue. Now you are no longer
asked.

You are told: Drop it, you are off-topic.


Michiel van der Vlist
Moderator FTSC_PUBLIC

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20130111