Received: from saf.tzo.com ([140.239.225.181])
 by fanciful.org (wcSMTP v5.6.450.3)
 with SMTP id 120998625; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 09:23:50 -0800
Received: from 206.46.170.173 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2003021012251275095 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Mon, 10 Feb 2003 17:25:12 GMT
Received: from BobDial ([67.248.207.159]) by pop016.verizon.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.05.20 201-253-122-126-120-20021101) with ESMTP
          id 
          for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:23:39 -0600
Message-ID: 
From: "Bob Dial" 
To: 
References: 

Subject: Re: Rights to shoot/Carl
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:27:16 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at pop016.verizon.net from
[67.248.207.159] at Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:23:37 -0600


----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Cook" 
To: 
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 9:12 AM
Subject: Rights to shoot


>
>
> Now and then, the subject of "Where is it OK to Shoot" comes
up. Here is a
> newly published brief by a lawyer on this subject . The author also wrote
> the book, Legal Handbook for Photographers. Applies to USA only.

Thanks for posting this URL, Carl.  

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5