ZZ>
  > I find myself in need of an OS/2 Compiler. As I no longer
  > work in an OS/2 shop, I don't have access to any.
  >
  > I have used Cset++, but it seems to be on the expensive
  > side. Has anyone had any experience with other compilers?
  > (Watcom, Borland, ...).
ZZ>

  I've had experience with five of them (IBM VisualAge C++, MetaWare
  High C++, Watcom C++, Borland C++, and EMX C++), and you can benefit
  from some of that experience by reading the Pros and Cons list.

  Read the list, decide which pros outweigh which cons for you, and
  decide.

ZZ>
  > I can live without a PM class library if I have to, but I
  > need SOM support and bindings for C and C++.
ZZ>

  The SOMObjects Travel Guide (not published here in the echo, but it is
  in the Pros and Cons Archive) goes into some detail on SOM toolkits
  and the various levels of support available with each C++ compiler.

    > JdeBP  Keeper of the <
   > Highly Unofficial FIDONET OS2PROG C++ Compiler Pros and Cons List <
       > Available via File Request as PROSCONS.ZIP from 2:440/4.0 <
___
 X MegaMail 2.10 #0:

--- Maximus/2 2.02